Although not a specific form type in microsoft dynamics crm 2016 customization pdf, CRM 2013 introduced a whole new layout for the default entity forms as a part of the UI refresh. CRM 2013 forms are made up of three columns that can consist of not just entity fields but also related entity subgrids, the social pane, Bing Maps component and other exciting new features. CRM versions, customers who are upgrading their Dynamics CRM deployment to the latest version are advised to migrate into using these new forms.
Sounds like a handy feature, right? There’s only one slight problem with it: it doesn’t work. What do you mean it doesn’t work? I have used the button to bring in my custom fields and it did just what I expected. Well, maybe I should rather say that it works partially. If you never export your CRM customizations into a solution file and move it to a different environment, you may not notice that anything is wrong with your forms. What the system is telling us is that we’re trying to insert an item into the customization metadata that has a non-unique ID.
Depending on the scenario, the item could be a field or section label. But how did the ID end up being a duplicate? After all, we don’t assign these GUID values in the customization UI, rather the CRM platform generates them. What could have caused the system to violate its own rules?
The answer can be found from this thread on the MSDN forums: CRM 2013 Solution Import. A Microsoft support engineer has confirmed that the error is caused by a design mistake in the Merge Forms feature. Apparently in the process of merging form content from the old form onto the new one there is more data carried over than is needed. In the environment I was working on this would have required many hours of work with using the form editor on a number of entities , which I wasn’t too keen on spending there. I extracted the CRM solution zip file and poked around the customization. I proceeded with creating a copy of each of the entity forms where I had used the Merge Forms feature.
CRM platform assigns the required new ID’s to the form components. Design So, with the above workaround and a potential upcoming hotfix, is there any reason not to use the Merge Forms feature? In my humble opinion, the merge process is not a best practice but rather just a quick’n dirty way of getting the custom fields to appear on the entity forms. Instead of taking the shortcut and doing a quick content merge, I recommend investing a bit more time and effort in planning what’s the best way to present the data and how to make it as easy as possible for the users to interact with it through the UI. BTW I think MS have since rescinded their advice about not supporting the CRM 2011 forms in CRM 2015? Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. Please forward this error screen to sharedip-166622762.
Having this information consolidated is going to be very useful for setting up new installations, as well as existing. I rarely re-post stuff, but this time this was just far too useful, and I still know people who for some reason do come to my blog, but are not clicking further to the NAV Team Blog, which is a shame. I see this mistake often being made or attempted by developers, even though it has been documented inside . NET Interoperability documentation since it was introduced with 2009 R2. Make sure that you don’t access the Microsoft. Force switch, and always ask for confirmation regardless of whether you include the -Confirm switch or not. The format 9 formats the variable according to XML standards, and this value can then be interpreted correctly on any system with any regional settings.
To check if a BLOB field has a value, you call its HASVALUE function. This was changed in NAV 2009, so ever since that version you can check HASVALUE before you decide to call CALCFIELDS first. 2GB of data over just to see if anything is inside. CALCFIELDS first, HASVALUE next, maybe it’s time for you to reconsider it. Do you have a value, Mr. It is after the original transaction, yes.
Laura: Hi, and thanks for commenting here! Paul: late to the show, eh? Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. Microsoft Windows 2000 Accelerated Exam for MCPs Certified on Microsoft Windows NT 4. Implementing Security for Applications with Microsoft Visual Basic .
TS: Windows Applications Development with Microsoft . TS: Windows Communication Foundation Development with Microsoft . TS: Web Applications Development with Microsoft . TS: Accessing Data with Microsoft . Pro: Designing and Developing Windows Applications Using Microsoft . Pro: Designing and Developing Web Applications Using Microsoft .